Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1672023 09 20.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742119

This case describes a 36-year-old woman who presents with acute painful ulcers of the vulva four days after a covid-19 infection. Extensive additional examination ruled out sexually transmitted diseases and auto-immune diseases, leaving acute vulvar ulcers, triggered by a covid-19 infection, as likely diagnosis. The ulcers healed spontaneously without scarring.


Acute Pain , COVID-19 , Vulvar Diseases , Female , Humans , Adult , Ulcer/diagnosis , Vulvar Diseases/diagnosis , Vulvar Diseases/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Vulva , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/etiology
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 486, 2020 Aug 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32831032

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that a history of preeclampsia is an important risk factor for future cardiovascular events. Awareness of this risk could provide opportunities for identification of women at risk, with opportunities for prevention and / or early intervention. A standardized follow-up has not yet been implemented in the north of the Netherlands. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the opinions and wishes among women and physicians about the follow-up for women with a history of preeclampsia. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 15 women and 14 physicians (5 obstetricians, 4 general practitioners, 3 vascular medicine specialists and 2 cardiologists) were performed and addressed topics about knowledge on CVR, current - and future follow-up. Women were approached through the HELLP foundation and their physicians. Physicians were approached by email. The interviews were recorded, typed and coded using ATLAS.ti software. A theoretical-driven thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Women had some knowledge about the association between preeclampsia and the increased CVR, but missed information from their health care providers. Specialists were aware of the association, but the information and advice they provided to their patients was minimal and inconsistent according to themselves. Whereas some general practitioners regarded their own knowledge as limited. There was a clear desire among women for a more extensive follow-up with specific attention to both emotional and physical consequences of preeclampsia. Physicians indicated that they preferred to see a follow up program concerning the CVR at the general practitioner as part of the already existent cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) program. CONCLUSION: Women and medical specialists consider it important to improve aftercare for women after a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Introducing these women into the CVRM program at the general practitioner is regarded as a preferred first step. Further research is warranted to establish an evidence-based guideline for the follow-up of these women.


Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Pre-Eclampsia/psychology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Humans , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
...